Everyone who has travelled over Eastern England knows the smaller country-houses with which it is studded, the rather dank little buildings, usually in the Italian style, surrounded with parks of some eighty to a hundred acres. For me they have always had a very strong attraction: with the grey paling of split oak, the noble trees, the meres with their reed-beds, and the line of distant woods.
Then, I like the pillared portico–perhaps stuck onto a red-brick Queen Anne house which has been faced with stucco to bring it into line with the ‘Grecian’ taste of the end of the eighteenth century; the hall inside, going up to the roof, which hall ought always to be provided with a gallery and a small organ.
I like the library too, where you may find anything from Psalter of the thirteenth century to a Shakespeare quarto. I like the pictures of course and perhaps most of all, I like fancying what life in such a house was like, when it was first built and in the piping times of landlords’ prosperity and not least now, when if money is not so plentiful, taste is more varied and life quite as interesting. I wish to have one of these houses and enough money to keep it together and entertain my friends in it modestly.
But this is a digression. I have to tell you of a curious series of events which happened in such a house as I have tried to describe. It is Castringham Hall in Suffolk. I think a good deal has been done to the building since the period of my story, but the essential features I have sketched are still there: the Italian portico, square block of white house, older inside than out, park with fringe of woods and mere. The one feature that marked out the house from a score of others is gone.
As you looked at it from the park, you saw on the right a great old ash-tree growing within half a dozen yards of the wall and almost or quiet touching the building with its branches. I suppose it had stood there ever since Castringham ceased to be a fortified place and since the moat was filled in and the Elizabethan dwelling-house built. At any rate, it had wellnigh attained its full dimensions in the year 1690.
In that year, the district in which the Hall is situated was the scene of a number of witch-trials. It will be long, I think, before we arrive at a just estimate of the amount of solid reason, if there was any, which lay at the root of the universal fear of witches in old times. Whether the persons accused of this offence really did imagine that they were possessed of unusual powers of any kind or whether they had the will at least, if not the power, of doing mischief to their neighbors or whether all the confessions, of which there are so many, were extorted by the mere cruelty of the witch-finders–these are questions which are not, I fancy, yet solved. And the present narrative gives me pause. I cannot altogether sweep it away as mere invention. The reader must judge for himself.
Castringham contributed a victim to the auto-da-fe. Mrs. Mothersole was her name and she differed from the ordinary run of village witches only in being rather better off and in more influential position. Efforts were made to save her by several reputable farmers of the parish. They did their best to testify to her character and showed considerable anxiety as to the verdict of the jury.
But what seems to have been fatal to the woman was the evidence of the then proprietor of Castringham Hall–Sir Matthew Fell. He deposed to having watched her on three different occasions from his window, at the full of the moon, gathering sprigs ‘from the ash-tree near my house’. She had climbed into the branches, clad only in her shift and was cutting off small twigs with a peculiarly curved knife and as she did so, she seemed to be talking to herself. On each occasion, Sir Matthew had done his best to capture the woman, but she had always taken alarm at some accidental noise he had made and all he could see, when he got down to the garden was a hare running across the park in the direction of the village.
On the third night, he had been at the pains to follow at his best speed and had gone straight to Mrs. Mothersole’s house, but he had to wait a quarter of an hour battering at her door, and then she had come out very cross and apparently very sleepy, as if just out of bed, and he had no good explanation to offer for his visit. Mainly on this evidence, though there was much more of a less striking and unusual kind from other parishioners, Mrs. Mothersole was found guilty and condemned to die. She was hanged a week after the trial with fiver or six more unhappy creatures, at Bury St. Edmunds.
Sir Matthew Fell, then Deputy-Sheriff, was present at the execution. It was a damp, drizzly March morning when the cart made its way up the rough grass hill outside Northgate, where the gallows stood. The other victims were apathetic or broken down with misery, but Mrs. Mothersole was, as in life so in death, of a very different temper. Her “poysonous Rage” as a reporter of the time puts it, “did so work upon the Bystanders–yea, even upon the Hangman–that it was constantly affirmed of all that saw her that she presented the living Aspect of a mad Divell. Yet she offer’d no Resistance to the Officers of the Law; only one she looked upon those that laid Hands upon her with so direfull and venomous an Aspect that–as one of them afterwards assured me–the meer Thought of it preyed inwardly upon his Mind for six Months after.”
However, all that she is reported to have said was the seemingly meaningless words: “There will be guests at the Hall”. Which she repeated more than once in undertone. Sir Matthew Fell was not unimpressed by the bearing of the woman. He had some talk upon the matter with the Vicar of his parish, with whom he travelled home after the assize business was over.
His evidence at the trial had not been very willingly given; he was not specially infected with the witch-finding mania, but he declared then and afterwards, that he could not give any other account of the matter than that he had given, and that he could not possibly have been mistaken as to what he saw. The whole transaction had been repugnant to him, for he was a man who liked to be on pleasant terms with those about him, but he saw a duty to be done in this business and he had done it. That seems to have been the gist of his sentiments and the Vicar applauded it, as any reasonable man must have done.
A few weeks after, when the moon of May was at the full, Vicar and squire met again in the park, and walked to the hall together. Lady Fell was with her mother, who was dangerously ill, and Sir Matthew was alone at home; so the Vicar Mr. Crome was easily persuaded to take a late supper at the hall. Sir Matthew was not very good company this evening. The talk ran chiefly on family and parish matters and, as luck would have it, Sir Matthew made a memorandum in writing of certain wishes or intentions of his regarding his estates, which afterward proved exceedingly useful.
When Mr. Crome thought of starting for home, about half-past nine o’clock, Sir Matthew and he took a preliminary turn on the graveled walk at the back of the house. The only incident that struck Mr. Crome was this: they were in sight of the ash-tree which I described as growing near the windows of the building, when Sir Matthew stopped and said:
“What is that that runs up and down the stem of the ash? It is never a squirrel? They will all be in their nests by now”.
The Vicar looked and saw the moving creature, but he could make nothing of its color in the moonlight. The sharp outline however seen for an instant, was imprinted on his brain and he could have sworn, he said though it sounded foolish, that squirrel or not, it had more than four legs. Still, not much was to be made of the momentary vision and the two men parted. They may have met since then, but it was not for a score of years.
Next day, Sir Matthew Fell was not downstairs at six in the morning as was his custom, nor at seven, nor yet at eight. Hereupon the servants went and knocked at his chamber door. I need not prolong the description of their anxious listenings and renewed batterings on the panels. The door was opened at last from the outside and they found their master dead and black. So much you have guessed. That there were any marks of violence did not at the moment appear, but the window was open.
One of the men went to fetch the parson and then by his directions rode onto give notice to the coroner. Mr. Crome himself went as quick as he might to the hall and was shown to the room where the dead man lay. He has left some notes among his papers which show how genuine a respect and sorrow was felt for Sir Matthew, and there is also this passage, which I transcribe for the sake of the light it throws upon the course of events, and also upon the common beliefs of the time:
“There was not any the least trace of an entrance having been forced to the chamber: but the casement stood open, as my poor friend would always have it in this season. He had his evening drink of small ale in a silver vessel of about a pint measure and tonight had not drunk it out. This drink was examined by the physician from Bury, a Mr. Hodgkins, who could not, however, as he afterwards declared upon his oath, before the coroner’s quest discover that any matter of a venomous kind was present in it. For, as was natural, in the great swelling and blackness of the corpse, there was talk made among the neighbors of Poyson.
“The body was very much disordered as it laid in the bed, being twisted after so extreme a sort as gave too probably conjecture that my worthy friend and patron had expired in great pain and agony. And what is as yet unexplained and to myself the great argument of some horrid and artful design in the perpetrators of this barbarous murder was this that the women which were entrusted with the laying-out of the corpse and washing it, being both sad persons and very well respected in their mournful profession, came to me in a great pain and distress both of mind and body saying what was indeed confirmed upon the first view that they had no sooner touched the breast of the corpse with their naked hands than they were sensible of more than ordinary violent smart and aching in their palms which with their whole forearms, in no long time swelled so immoderately, the pain still continuing that as afterwards proved, during many weeks they were forced to lay by the exercise of their calling and yet no mark seen on the skin.”
“Upon hearing this, I sent for the physician, wo was still in the house and we made as carful a proof as we were able by the help of a small magnifying lens of crystal of the condition of the skin on this part of the body, but could not detect with the instrument we had any matter of importance beyond a couple of small punctures or pricks, which we then concluded were the spots by which the poison might be introduced, remembering that ring of Pope Borgia with other known specimens of the horrid art of the Italian poisoners of the last age.”
“So much is to be said of the symptoms seen on the corpse. As to what I am to add, it is merely my own experiment and to be left to posterity to judge whether there be anything of value therein. There was on the table by the bedside a bible of the small size in which my friend, punctual as in matters of less moment so in this more weighty one used nightly and upon his first rising, to read a set portion. And I taking it up–not without a tear duly paid to him which from the study of this poorer adumbration was now passed to the contemplation of its great original–it came to my thoughts as at such moments of helplessness we are prone to catch at any the least glimmer that makes promise of light to make trial of that old and by many accounted superstitious practice of drawing the sortes of which a principal instance in the case of his late sacred majesty the blessed martyr King Charles and my Lord Falkland, was now much talked of.”
“I must needs admit that by my trial not much assistance was afforded me: yet, as the cause and origin of these dreadful events may hereafter be searched out, I set down the results, in the case it may be found that they pointed the true quarter of the mischief to a quicker intelligence than my own. I made then three trials, opening the book and placing my finger upon certain words: which gave in the first these words from Luke xiii. 7, cut it down, in the second, Isaiah xiii. 20, It shall never be inhabited and upon the third experiment, Job xxxix. 30, Her young ones also suck up blood.”
This is all that need be quoted from Mr. Crome’s papers. Sir Matthew Fell was duly coffined and laid into the earth and his funeral sermon, preached by Mr. Crome on the following Sunday, has been printed under the title of ‘The Unsearchable Way: or, England’s Danger and the Malicious Dealings of Antichrist’, it being the Vicar’s view, as well as that most commonly held in the neighborhood, that the Squire was the victim of a recrudescence of the popist plot.
His son, Sir Matthew the second, succeeded to the title and estates. And so ends the first act of the Castringham tragedy. It is to be mentioned, though the fact is not surprising, that the new Baronet did not occupy the room in which his father had died. Nor indeed was it slept in by anyone but an occasional visitor during the whole of his occupation. He died in 1735 and I do not find that anything particular marked his reign, save a curiously constant mortality among his cattle and livestock in general, which showed a tendency to increase slightly as time went on.
Those who are interested in the details will find a statistical account in a letter to the Gentleman’s Magazine of 1772, which draws the facts from the Baronet’s own papers. He put an end to it at last by a very simple expedient, that of shutting up all his beasts in sheds at night and keeping no sheep in his park. For he had noticed that nothing was ever attacked that spent the night indoors. After that the disorder confined itself to wild birds and beasts of chase. But as we have no good account of the symptoms and as all-night watching was quite unproductive of any clue, I do not dwell on what the Suffolk farmers called the ‘Castringham sickness’.
The second Sir Matthew died in 1735 as I said and was duly succeeded by his son Sir Richard. It was in his time that the great family pew was built out on the north side of the parish church. So large were the Squire’s ideas that several of the graves on that unhallowed side of the building had to be disturbed to satisfy his requirements. Among them was that of Mrs. Mothersole, the position of which was accurately known, thanks to a note on a plan of the church and yard, both made by Mr. Crome.
A certain amount of interest was excited in the village, when it was known that the famous witch, who was still remembered by a few, was to be exhumed. And the feeling of surprise and indeed disquiet was very strong when it was found that, though her coffin was fairly sound and unbroken, there was not trace whatever inside it of body, bones, or dust. Indeed, it is a curious phenomenon, for at the time of her burying no such things were dreamt of as resurrection-men and it is difficult to conceive any rational motive for stealing a body otherwise than for the uses of the dissecting-room.
The incident revived for a time all the stories of witch-trials and of the exploits of the witches, dormant for forty years, and Sir Richard’s orders that the coffin should be burnt were thought by a good many to be rather foolhardy, though they were duly carried out.
Sir Richard was a pestilent innovator, it is certain. Before his time in the hall had been a fine block of the mellowest red brick, but Sir Richard had traveled in Italy and become infected with the Italian taste and, having more money than his predecessors, he determined to leave an Italian palace where he had found an English house. So stucco and ashlar masked the brick, some indifferent Roman marbles were planted about in the entrance-hall and gardens; a reproduction of the Sibyl’s temple at Tivoli was erected on the opposite bank of the mere and Castingham took on an entirely new, and I must say, a less engaging aspect. But it was much admired and served as a model to a good many of the neighboring gentry in after-years.
One morning (it was in 1754), Sir Richard woke after a night of discomfort. It had been windy and his chimney had smoked persistently, and yet it was so cold that he must keep up a fire. Also something had so rattled about the wind that no man could get a moment’s peace. Further, there was the prospect of several guests of position arriving in the course of the day, who would expect sport of some kind and the inroads of the distemper (which continued among his game) had been lately so serious that he was afraid for his reputation as a game-preserver. But what really touched him most nearly was the other matter of his sleepless night. He could certainly not sleep in that room again.
That was the chief subject of his meditations at breakfast and after it, he began a systematic examination of the rooms to see which would suit his notion best. It was long before he found one. This had a window with an eastern aspect and that with a northern; this door the servants would always be passing, and he did not like the bedstead in that. No, he must have a room with a western look-out, so that the sun could not wake him early and it must be out of the way of the business of the house. The housekeeper was at the end of her resources.
“Well, Sir Richard,” she said, “you know that there is but one room like that in the house.”
“Which may that be,” said Sir Richard.
“And that is Sir Matthew’s–the West Chamber”.
“Well, put me in there, for there I’ll lie tonight,” said her master, “which way is it? Here, to be sure” and he hurried off.
“Oh, Sir Richard, but no one has slept there for these forty years. The air has hardly been changed since Sir Matthew died there.”
Thus she spoke and rushed after him.
“Come, open the door Mrs. Chiddock. I’ll see the chamber at least”.
So it was opened and indeed, the smell was very close and earthy. Sir Richard crossed to the window and impatiently, as was his wont, threw the shutters back and flung open the casement. For this end of the house was one which the alterations had barely touched, grown up as it was with the great ash-tree and being otherwise concealed from view.
“Air it Mrs. Chiddock, all today and move my bed-furniture in the afternoon. Put the Bishop of Kilmore in my old room”.
“Pray Sir Richard,” said a new voice, breaking in on this speech, “might I have the favor of a moment’s interview?”
Sir Richard turned round and saw a man in black in the doorway, who bowed.
“I must ask your indulgence for this intrusion Sir Richard. You will perhaps hardly remember me. My name is William Crome and my grandfather was Vicar here in your grandfather’s time”.
“Well sir,” said Sir Richard, “the name of Crome is always a passport to Castringham. I am glad to renew a friendship of two generations’ standing. In what can I serve you? For your hour of calling–and, if I do not mistake you, your bearing shows you to be in some haste”.
“That is no more than the truth sir. I am riding from Norwich to Bury St. Edmunds with what haste I can make, and I have called in on my way to leave with you some papers which we have but just come upon in looking over what my grandfather left at his death. It is thought you may find some matters of family interest in them”.
“You are mighty obliging Mr. Crome and, if you will be so good as to follow me to the parlor and drink a glass of wine, we will take a first look at these same papers together and you Mrs. Chiddock, as I said, be about airing this chamber…Yes, it is here my grandfather died…Yes, the tree perhaps does make the place a little dampish…No, I don not wish to listen to any more. Make no difficulties, I beg. You have your orders–go. Will you follow me sir”?
They went to the study. The packet which young Mr. Crome had brought–he was then just become a Fellow of Clare Hall in Cambridge, I may say, and subsequently brought out a respectable edition of Polyaenus contained among other things the notes which the old Vicar had made upon the occasion of Sir Matthew Fell’s death. And for the first time, Sir Richard was confronted with the enigmatical Sortes Biblicae which you have heard. They amused him a good deal.
“Well”, he said, “my grandfather’s Bible gave one prudent piece of advice–Cut it down. If that stands for the ash-tree, he may rest assured I shall not neglect it. Such a nest of cattarrhs and agues was never seen”.
The parlor contained the family books, which pending the arrival of a collection which Sir Richard had made in Italy and the building of a proper room to receive them, were not many in number. Sir Richard looked up from the paper to the bookcase.
“I wonder”, says he, “whether the old prophet is there yet? I fancy I see him”.
Crossing the room, he took out a dumpy Bible, which sure enough, bore on the flyleaf the inscription: ‘To Matthew Fell, from his loving godmother, Anne Aldous, 2 September, 1659’.
“It would be no bad plan to test him again Mr. Crome. I will wager we get a couple of names in the Chronicles. “H’m! What have we here? ‘Thou shalt seek me in the morning and I shall not be’. Well, well! Your grandfather would have made a fine omen of that, hey? No more prophets for me! They are all in a tale. And now, Mr. Crome, I am infinitely obliged to you for your packet. You will, I fear, be impatient to get on. Pray allow me–another glass.”
So, with offers of hospitality, which were genuinely meant (for Sir Richard thought well of the young man’s address and manner) they parted. In the afternoon came the guests: the Bishop of Kilmore, Lady Mary Hervey, Sir William Kentfield, etc. Dinner at five, wine, cards, supper and dispersal to bed.
Next morning, Sir Richard is disinclined to take his gun with the rest. He talks with the Bishop of Kilmore. This prelate, unlike a good many of the Irish Bishops of his day, had visited his see and indeed, resided there for some considerable time. This morning, as the two were walking along the terrace and talking over the alterations and improvements in the house, the Bishop said, pointing to the window of the WEst Room:
“You could never get one of my Irish flock to occupy that room Sir Richard.”
“Why is that my lord? It is in fact my own.”
“Well, our Irish peasantry will always have it that it brings the worst of luck to sleep near an ash-tree and you have a fine growth of ash not two yards from your chamber window. Perhaps,” the Bishop went on with a smile, “it has given you a touch of its quality already, for you do not seem, if I may say it, so much the fresher for your night’s rest as your friends would like to see you.”
“That, or something else, it is true, cost me my sleep from twelve to four my lord. But the tree is to come down tomorrow, so I shall not hear much more from it”.
“I applaud your determination. It can hardly be wholesome to have the air you breathe strained, as it were, through all that leafage.”
“Your lordship is right there, I think. But I had not my window open last night. It was rather the noise that went on–no doubt from the twigs sweeping the glass–that kept me open-eyed.”
“I think that can hardly be Sir Richard. Here–you see it from this point. None of these nearest branches even can touch your casement, unless there were a gale and there was none of that last night. They miss the panes by a foot.”
“No, sir, true. What then will lit be I wonder, that scratched and rustled so–ay and covered the dust on my sill with lines and marks?”
At last they agreed that rats must have come up through the ivy. That was the Bishop’s idea and Sir Richard jumped at it. So, the day passed quietly and night came, and the party dispersed to their rooms, and wished Sir Richard a better night.
And now we are in his bedroom with the light out and the Squire in bed. The room is over the kitchen and the night outside still and warm, so the window stands open. There is very little light about the bedstead, but there is a strange movement there; it seems as if Sir Richard were moving his head rapidly to and fro with only the slightest possible sound. And now you would guess, so deceptive is the half-darkness, that he had several heads, round and brownish, which move back and forward, even as low as his chest. It is a horrible illusion. Is it nothing more? There! Something drops off the bed with a soft plump, like a kitten, and is out of the window in a flash, another–four–and after that there is quiet again.
‘Thou shalt seek me in the morning, and I shall not be.’
As with Sir Matthew, so with Sir Richard–dead and black in his bed! A pale and silent party of guests and servants gathered under the window, when the news was known. Italian poisoners, Popish emissaries, infected air–all these and more guesses were hazarded and the Bishop of Kilmore looked at the tree, in the fork of whose lower boughs a white tom-cat was crouching, looking down the hollow which years had gnawed in the trunk. It was watching something inside the tree with great interest. Suddenly, it got up and craned over the hole. Then a bit of the edge on which it stood gave way and it went slithering in.
Everyone looked up at the noise of the fall. It is known to most of us that a cat can cry, but few of us have heard, I hope, such a yell as came out of the trunk of the great ash. Two or three screams there were–the witnesses are not sure which–and then a slight and muffled noise of some commotion or struggling was all that came. But Lady Mary Hervey fainted outright, and the housekeeper stopped her ears and fled till she fell on the terrace.
The Bishop of Kilmore and Sir William Kentfield stayed. Yet even they were daunted, though it was only at the cry of a cat and Sir William swallowed once or twice, before he could say:
“There is something more than we know of in that tree my lord. I am for an instant search.”
And this was agreed upon. A ladder was brought and one of the gardeners went up and, looking down the hollow, could detect nothing but a few dim indications of something moving. They got a lantern and let it down by a rope.
“We must get at the bottom of this. My life upon it my lord, but the secret of these terrible deaths is there.”
Up went the gardener with the lantern and let it down the hole cautiously. They saw the yellow light upon his face as he bent over and saw his face struck with an incredulous terror and loathing, before he cried out in a dreadful voice and fell back from the ladder–where, happily, he was caught by two of the men–letting the lantern fall inside the tree. He was in a dead faint and it was some time, before any word could be got from him.
By then they had something else to look at. The lantern must have broken at the bottom and the light in it caught upon dry leaves and rubbish that lay there, for in a few minutes a dense smoke began to come up and then flame, and to be short, the tree was in a blaze. The bystanders made a ring at some yards’ distance, and Sir William and the Bishop sent men to get what weapons and tools they could; for clearly, whatever might be using the tree as its lair would be forced out by the fire.
So it was. First, at the fork, they saw a round body covered with fire–the size of a man’s head–appear very suddenly, then seem to collapse and fall back. This, five or six times, then a similar ball leapt into the air and fell on the grass, where after a moment it lay still. The Bishop went as near as he dared to it and aw–what but the remains of an enormous spider, veinous and seared! And, as the fire burned lower down, more terrible bodies like this began to break out from the trunk, and it was seen that these were covered in grayish hair.
All that day, the ash burned and until it fell to pieces, the men stood about it and from time to time killed the brutes as they darted out. At last there was a long interval when none appeared and they cautiously closed in and examined the roots of the tree.
“They found”, says the Bishop of Kilmore, “below it a rounded hollow place in the earth, wherein were two or three bodies of these creatures that had plainly been smothered by the smoke and what is more curious, at the side of this den, against the wall was crouching the anatomy or skeleton of a human being with the skin dried upon the bones, having some remains of black hair, which was pronounced by those that examined it to be undoubtedly the body of a woman, and clearly dead for a period of fifty years.”